logo

BNSF Bridge #84.93

Concrete Slab Bridge over Unnamed Ditch
Thompson, Grand Forks County, North Dakota

Click the Photo Above to See All Photos of This Bridge!
Name BNSF Bridge #84.93
Built By Great Northern Railway
Contractor Unknown
Currently Owned By BNSF Railway
Length 48 Feet Total, 16 Foot Spans
Width 1 Track
Height Above Ground 5 Feet (Estimated)
Superstructure Type Concrete Slab
Substructure Type Concrete
Date Built 1922
Traffic Count 10 Trains/Day (Estimated)
Current Status In Use
BNSF Bridge Number 84.93
Significance Minimal Significance
Documentation Date August 2020
In 1881, the St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway built a line from Fargo, North Dakota to Grand Forks, North Dakota.
This new line allowed for faster shipments between two of the largest cities in the booming North Dakota.

In 1890, the StPM&M became a part of the Great Northern Railway. The Great Northern continued to operate this line through the 20th century, providing a critical connection between Fargo and North Dakota, which was also accomplished with several parallel lines.
However, the GN preferred this line to the P Line, the Ada Subdivision or the Mayville Line. In 1970, when the Great Northern merged with Northern Pacific and Chicago, Burlington & Quincy to form Burlington Northern; this was well shown.
While the other lines were slowly abandoned, this line became priority for upgrades.

In 1996, the BN merged with Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe to form BNSF Railway, the current operator of this line. It is currently operated as the Hillsboro Subdivision.
06/26/21


Located just south of Thompson along County Road 17 at 4th Avenue, this standard concrete slab bridge crosses an unnamed ditch.
Built in 1922, the bridge features three concrete slab spans, set onto concrete substructures. These spans follow a standard design for the Great Northern.
This style bridge was commonly used to cross small streams because of the cheap cost, easy installation and limited maintenance required. Typically, these were used to replace wooden trestles. A span like this could often be built while only interrupting traffic for short times.
Overall, the bridge appears to be in fair to poor condition, with deterioration noted throughout the structure.

The author has ranked the bridge as being minimally significant, due to the common design.
The photo above is an overview.

Citations

Source Type

Source

Build Date Stamp
Railroad Line History Source ICC Valuation Information, Compiled by Richard S. Steele



Widget is loading comments...



© Copyright 2010- John Marvig and Contributors. All Rights Reserved